Latest posts
-
November 7th: This Day In Herstory, This Decade in Fury

There is a habit in American storytelling that treats progress like a moving walkway in an airport. Step on, move forward, arrive at the gate of equality with time for a coffee. The trouble is that our walkway is seasonal. It runs when people push the button and it stalls when cowards pull the plug.
-
Clean Toilets, Dirty Secrets: ICE Finally Gets a Court-Ordered Makeover in Broadview

Somewhere between bureaucracy and mildew, the Constitution just won a small victory. This week, a federal judge in Chicago decided that the Bill of Rights applies even when the floors are wet. U.S. District Judge Robert Gettleman issued a temporary restraining order forcing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to clean up the Broadview detention facility
-
Democrats Tuesday Night Lesson: The Cure For Whisper Politics

If Democrats want to govern, they have to stop apologizing for oxygen, pick fights they can win in public, scrap the procedural choke points on purpose, and brag until the story sticks. There is a certain sound to a party that does not trust itself. It is crisp, consultative, and terrified of verbs. You can
-
The Dick Cheney Legacy: When Power, Privilege and Paradox Collide

At 84, Dick Cheney leaves us a blueprint of power run amok, and a side note on gay rights that doesn’t redeem the wreckage. There is a kind of irony that follows the news of Dick Cheney’s death in 2025 like an aftershock: the man who helped expand the presidency’s power, condone torture, harden the
-
The Night New York Chose Hope Over Fear And Turned Zohran Mamdani’s Microphone On

A working city ignored a presidential threat, shrugged at nostalgia, and handed the job to a 34-year-old borough organizer who treated power like a verb. The story begins the way most power stories do, inside a pressure chamber. A president raised the cost of defiance on a city he does not love. A former governor
-
The Tariff King Goes to Court: Can One Man Tax a Nation by Proclamation?

There is something exquisitely American about watching a courtroom full of black-robed justices debate whether the President of the United States can wake up one morning, decide that toasters are a national security threat, and slap a fifty percent tax on them before lunch. That is, more or less, what the Supreme Court heard this



