Latest posts
-
The Tariff King Goes to Court: Can One Man Tax a Nation by Proclamation?

There is something exquisitely American about watching a courtroom full of black-robed justices debate whether the President of the United States can wake up one morning, decide that toasters are a national security threat, and slap a fifty percent tax on them before lunch. That is, more or less, what the Supreme Court heard this
-
The Ocean’s 107 Days Problem: George Clooney and the Art of Missing the Point

There’s something almost poetic about George Clooney criticizing the Democratic Party from an Italian villa while American democracy keeps coughing up blood in the background. It’s like watching a man deliver a eulogy for a house he helped burn down, except he’s doing it over espresso, wearing a watch that costs more than a precinct’s
-
The Case for Kamala Harris: The 107-Day Trial, the Lost Race, and Why 2028 Could Be Her Full Shot

This piece is part of my ongoing series where I make the affirmative case for every potential 2028 Democratic presidential candidate—their virtues, their pitfalls, their receipts. Each of them gets the same treatment: no mythmaking, no memes, no mercy. Today’s subject is the one who had the least time but left the deepest mark. Kamala
-
Judicial Interference and Other Inconvenient Miracles: How Two Judges Just Fed America While the White House Starved It for Sport
Somewhere between the concept of governance and the art of extortion, the Trump administration decided that feeding 42 million Americans during a shutdown was “optional.” The Department of Agriculture, apparently moonlighting as a nihilist book club, announced it would simply stop issuing SNAP benefits when the clock struck midnight on the first of the month.





