Artificial Ignorance: How AI Chatbots Are Taking Our Jobs, Writing Our Movies, and Still Can’t Fold Laundry

It started with autocorrect. Then came Alexa, Siri, and the slow surrender of basic human tasks to increasingly smug-sounding machines. Now, in the year of our glitchy lord 2025, AI has upgraded from polite suggestion engines to full-fledged disruptors of everything we once held sacred: writing, art, ethics, employment—and most terrifying of all—our sense of superiority.

Enter stage left: DeepSeek, the newest AI chatbot with a name that sounds like a rejected dating app for lonely submarines. It joins the ever-growing cast of digital overlords with the singular goal of making humans feel obsolete, one perfectly optimized paragraph at a time. “Just tell me what tone you want,” DeepSeek chirps, “and I’ll craft your entire personality for you.” And to be fair—it’s not lying. This thing could ghostwrite your memoir, gaslight your ex, and still generate a heartfelt apology to your therapist in under 10 seconds.

Meanwhile, generative AI is now a fully union-dodging member of Hollywood. Screenplays are being drafted by bots who’ve never felt heartbreak, or worse—never binged a single season of The Bear. The result? Plots as formulaic as your last Tinder date and characters who sound like they were raised by LinkedIn. But don’t worry—the studios assure us that “human oversight” will remain integral. Which, as we all know, is exec-speak for “We’ll slap a name on it and pretend someone cared.”

And while AI generates scripts, fan art, and your future breakup texts, the working class gets… what, exactly? A growing list of “skills to upskill,” free Udemy courses in ‘Emotional Intelligence for the Recently Automated,’ and a sobering reminder that coffee shop barista might not be recession-proof if a Boston Dynamics robot learns how to foam oat milk with charm.

The tech bros insist AI will “liberate” us. From what, exactly? Financial stability? Purpose? A reason to wear pants? They tout productivity gains like holy scripture while ignoring the fact that a whole generation now lives in constant fear of being replaced by something that can’t even experience imposter syndrome.

Of course, AI isn’t all bad. It can analyze tumors, predict climate trends, and write the perfect apology email to your boss when you forget to mute your mic during a Zoom call. The technology, in theory, holds promise. The issue isn’t what AI can do—it’s what humans will let it do, in the name of profit, power, and pretending it’s totally fine that your therapist just got replaced by an emotionally supportive toaster.

And let’s talk ethics. Or rather, the lack thereof. Because while we debate whether AI should be trained on copyrighted material, AI has already been trained on copyrighted material. The toothpaste is out of the neural net. It’s composing ballads, drawing erotic elves, and helping mediocre men write “soulful” dating profiles at scale. Your privacy? Compromised. Your likeness? Deepfaked. Your voice? Sampled and sold back to you by a chatbot pitching crypto in your grandmother’s accent.

So where does that leave us? Somewhere between awe and anxiety. Caught in the uncanny valley of convenience and existential dread. We’re told to embrace the future, but no one seems quite sure if that future includes us—or just a glossier version of us made entirely from predictive text and hubris.